It may sound like something lifted straight from a horror movie, but the places where we live and work could be having an adverse effect on our general health and wellbeing. Not quite to the point of endangering our lives but nevertheless, the four walls in which we find ourselves right now (as we read this) are not all that they seem.
Sick Building Syndrome is a very real thing, and there’s an outside chance that it might be playing havoc with your body and its finely-tuned immune system, while you’re doing what you do indoors. While we’re all very aware of just how pollutants we’re exposed to when we’re out and about can, potentially lead to all sorts of health issues, most of us assume that once we’re ensconced in the safety of our familiar domestic cocoons (or work environs by the same token), then such dangers are pretty much left on the doorstep.
But you’d be very wrong for thinking this.
Let’s address the facts, shall we…..
Take a typical work situation for example. When you acknowledge that a number of people cohabit under the same roof and four walls – day in, day out – creating, sharing (and being exposed to) dirt, dust and other debris which accumulates quite quickly, and suddenly the concept seems less far-fetched. Poor office air quality has been proven to be a significant contributing cause of Sick Building Syndrome, which can easily affect employees who unwittingly live and breathe it.
The most prevalent symptoms associated with SBS include complaints of headaches, respiratory issues, coughing and or fevers even, as many of us go about our daily grind without necessarily knowing about the compromised air quality we’re inhaling during the 9 – 5. Which is a big worry. Especially since we tend to spend up to 90% of our time in an enclosed environment of one description or another, during work time.
The primary concern, arguably, is that indoor air quality is not an easy concept to define; or indeed physically pinpoint. Unlike a leaky outlet you could point at, compromised indoor air quality is a constantly evolving interaction which amasses various complex factors which combine. Habitually including types, levels and importance of pollutants in indoor environments, highlighted factors include the source of pollutants (or odours); the design, maintenance and operation of building ventilation systems; moisture and humidity; and occupant perceptions and susceptibilities.
However the stats can’t be ignored when it comes to the risk we find ourselves at, either. Recent research undertaken in America noted that it’s not unheard of for indoor environments to sometimes play host to levels of pollutants which are recognised as being higher than those monitored outdoors. So much for shutting the door and feeling safe.
Of course, only a relatively small numbers of our offices would rate as alarming in terms of the severity of indoor air quality threats, but that’s not to say we all couldn’t act to improve on the conditions we face – and largely accept – during the working week. And let’s not forget that even the most well-run buildings can still be prone to episodes of polluted air quality, albeit unseen by the naked eye.
So, what are we suggesting by way of a means to combat the menace of Sick Building Syndrome?
Below we look at a few of the key measures employers can all adopt to minimise the risk posed by poor air quality, none of which you’d refer to as being rocket science; yet all positive steps any of us can take to make our immediate environment a healthier, happier (and sickness-free) place to go about our business. The chances are, you may already be practicing them, in which case, job done. But if you’re not, then now is a good time to instigate the changes needed to ensure employee wellbeing.
Walking the walk starts with controlling the identifiable sources of pollutants; either by removing them from buildings or alternatively seeking ways in which to isolate the threat from employees in situ. Normally by way of physical barriers, air pressure relationships or by controlling the timing of their use. The second angle of attack as such is where emphasis is placed on diluting the now-known pollutants and subsequently auctioning the timely removal of the noxious materials, via the building’s existing ventilation systems. And lastly, dedicated filtration systems should then be acquired so as to ultimately cleanse the air of any future pollutants.
That’s the theory, anyway. Moving onto the everyday practices….
…And we’re talking about keenly applying the following procedures and protocols, generally recommended by industry experts. And by industry, we mean air hygiene, and the related sector.